All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allah, and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger.
It is originally impermissible to film or spread videos including prohibited matters, such as women displaying their adornment, even if this act is done for a good purpose like introducing seekers of knowledge and spreading their knowledge. In truth, the benefit expected from spreading a video for a seeker of knowledge may be realized without filming such women. However, if the benefit cannot be realized except through prohibited acts, we should weigh the benefit versus the corruption, as follows: -"Which of them is greater than the other?" So, if the corruption is greater, filming such videos and spreading them are thus prohibited; otherwise, they would be lawful, and the lesser corruption would be forgiven due to the greater benefit to be realized. This is one of the cases in which an evil deed would be forgiven in order to get a good deed. Sheikh Al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyah said, “An evil deed may be committed in two cases: warding off a deed that is of more evil as long as it would not be prevented except through it or realizing a good deed that is more useful than it, taking into account that this good deed cannot be done except in the presence of this evil deed. As for the good deed, it may also be left in two cases: if it would lead to the missing of a more useful good deed or if doing it would lead to committing an evil deed the harm of it is greater than the benefit of the good deed. This is concerning the religious balances.”
As long as the seeker of knowledge mentioned in the question is not a scholar, the benefit expected from filming his sessions and broadcasting them is little if compared to the presence of these women in these videos.
Allah knows best.